As you know, in the Russian Federation can not be much «cheat» with automotive sites and aggregates. Change their number is not recommended because doing so might constitute a crime. It is impossible to overstate «class green» car — it is also illegal. And to apply these actions to the detriment of the state 4000000 rubles and is not recommended. The hearing was a very unusual case in Vladivostok. Limited Liability Company attempted to challenge the decision of the previous court prosecutions under Part 2 of the Administrative Code st.16.2 Russia (false declaration). Administrative offense importer was due to thrashing VIN numbers (numbers of the vehicle frame) of three tractors for understating\’s vehicle production, which would allow the organization to reduce imported customs duties. Tractors, for which frames were broken VIN numbers were imported to Vladivostok against the offending company to ship BREEZE. According to the Far Eastern Customs operations, Vladivostok customs inspection conducted, the results of which were assigned to customs examination and it was found out that the original number of frames represented by three cars were modified, and the manufacturer\’s information plate on the test cars were replaced by others, not made by the manufacturer. Such shifts have been taken importer to qualify as a new imported equipment, environmental grade of 4 or higher. At the same classification code is applied rate of import duty rate of 5% of the customs value of the goods. In fact, in Russia were imported tractors were in operation, with the release of which has been more than 7 years and in respect of which a significantly greater rate of import duty — 2.2 euro per 1 cu. See engine capacity. This allowed understate customs payments by more than 4 million rubles. Upon review of the complaint filed by the importer, the regional court ruled in favor of the Vladivostok customs. His investigation led Vladivostok Customs in close contact with the Far Eastern Customs operations. There has been an active legal support. However, unscrupulous importers decided to contest the court ruling Frunze city of Vladivostok, in which three truck tractors were confiscated. Boundary-value, the court issued its decision in favor of the Vladivostok customs. And no wonder — the arguments in its favor on the frames of tractors stamped «iron.» And, logically, such «free interpretation» handling units and apparatus in general could result in a more careful interest on the part of the Maritime Transport Prosecutor\’s Office and the Far Investigation Department of Transport in the UK part of the Russian art. 327 of the Criminal Code (forgery) and 159 of the Criminal Code (fraud). So it got off easy.
Eugene Zhitnikova