Ex-Major of Interior Ministry troops Igor Matveev, famous public appeal to the president to uncover the "lawlessness" in parts of the explosives again in Vladivostok - And again tries to defend his good name.
Ex-Major of Interior Ministry troops Igor Matveev, famous public appeal to the president to uncover the "lawlessness" in parts of the explosives, and later convicted of beating soldiers and sentenced to three and a half years in prison, again in Vladivostok - and again trying to protect his reputation name. Matveeva delivered in Vladivostok Garrison Court of Nizhny Tagil, where he is serving his sentence in the IR-13. The decision once again was not in favor of the stubborn major.
The initiator of the trial was himself Matveev, to challenge the earlier decision not to institute criminal proceedings against Colonel Makov - chief of staff of the brigade, which served Matveev himself in Vladivostok. Matveyev said that in May 2011 the Soviet District Court of Vladivostok (which dealt with the application brigade command about protecting their reputation that allegedly defamed Matveev his revelations; interestingly, in July, the Soviet court dismissed the lawsuit in /hr 6890 to Matveyev) was presented in the brigade order issued by April 232011 number 100 which said that Matveev revealed the illegal stay of foreign guest workers in part, known in Vladivostok called "BAM". Subsequently, in August of the same year, the garrison court where the case of the beating soldiers (in this case Matveev and was sentenced to imprisonment), this order is also presented as evidence, but its content was already different. Matveev found that the document was subjected to fraud, and demanded to look into this matter.
The investigation in October 2012 denied Matveyev without becoming open a case of fraud orders. It is this decision of the former major-now tried to appeal. It's not just the fact of forgery of the order itself. If Matveeva support the court, it could have significant legal implications for the fate of the major, because then it turns out that he was convicted on the basis of (including) the false evidence. "If in my first case in the court submitted falsified evidence, it challenges the sentence handed down to me, besides the Mac was one of the witnesses for the prosecution," - said the ex-major.
The meeting garrison court on 16 May. Sports Suit, assembled view - Igor Matveyev is still willing to answer any detailed questions in the language of legal language. The content of the complaint, he was reading for nearly two hours. Decision to dismiss Matveev called unreasonable, stating that the investigator not only was inspected properly, but he switched the subject of the application. "I am very tired of this verbiage and distortion" - Matveyev said. Citing a number of arguments, it is claimed that the order was subjected to intentional distortion aimed at concealing the misconduct committed by Makov and others.
Lawyer Olga Matveeva Gryanchenko also called the decision not unlawful and unreasonable. "No need to be an outstanding lawyer to understand that if we have two mutually exclusive content of the order, one of them is true, and another - falsified - says Gryanchenko. - This fact, perhaps, would not be so dangerous if these materials are not proof in a criminal case, if they do not contain a reference to the court verdict, if they are brought to the court so severe officials. If it is a falsification of evidence in the criminal case - this is a crime against justice, although some officials really do not want it to notice. "
The investigator who failed to prosecute Matveyev, was succinct in court, saying that he considered his decision lawful and justified. Judge Ruslan Matveev Orlova arguments did not convince, bringing the appeal was denied. Gryanchenko lawyer intends to appeal the decision.
Yegor Kuzmich, " New Paper in Vladivostok "
