Primorye sued the Muscovites 38 million for the construction of the pipeline

The Fifth Appellate Court upheld the trial court's decision to refuse to recover from the seaside "Construction and Industrial Company" 17 million 662 thousand 75997 rubles in favor of "Mezhregiontruboprovodstroy" (Moscow) and the satisfaction of the counter-claims - Collection of OAO "Mezhregiontruboprovodstroy" in to LLC "Construction and Industrial Company" 34 million 788 thousand 04096 rubles of debt on construction site "gas pipeline" Sakhalin-Khabarovsk-Vladivostok "."

September 212009 between "Mezhregiontruboprovodstroy" (general contractor, Moscow) and "Construction and Industrial Company" (sub-contractor) signed an agreement on the construction of "gas pipeline Sakhalin-Khabarovsk-Vladivostok station 133.9 - 158.0 km. "

In pursuance of the said agreement "MRTS" transferred Ltd. "SEC" 2883112379 rubles. March 312011 the parties signed the certificate of the value of work performed by the subcontractor the amount of 1116836382 rubles.

Assuming that the company "SEC" unfounded preserved 1766275997 rubles, listed as an advance under this agreement, JSC "MRTS" appealed to arbitration a claim for recovery. At the same time, Ltd. "SEC" filed a counter-claim against the JSC "MRTS" to recover from it 3478804096 rubles costs incurred by the subcontractor during construction, but not recorded in the books.

JSC "MRTS" filed suit in the Moscow Arbitration Court, which established the disputed contract not concluded and handed the petition to the jurisdiction of the Arbitration Court of Primorye. By a decision of 5 February 2013 Arbitration Court of Primorye denied "MRTS" during the recovery from the subcontractor the amount of unjust enrichment, because the LLC "SEC" in court proved that in the course of work under the contract it carried the additional cost of mobilization and demobilization of equipment, construction and content shift camp, transport costs, employee salaries, etc. Therefore, counterclaims LLC "SEC" were completely satisfied - with the Moscow company recovered 3478804096 rubles.

The Fifth Appellate Court considered the appeal on May 13 of "MRTS" found no grounds for the annulment of the trial court and upheld it, said Marina Kratanchuk, chief of public relations and mass media of the Fifth Appellate Court.