Developer of residential quarters of Vladivostok, which popularized throughout the country, will have to part with a large sum of money from the delayed construction. Subcontracting the company had to pass the apartment building by the end of 2010 but did not show much zeal. The solution had to look in the courts.
As explained
Chief Specialist in Public Relations and Mass Media of the Fifth Appellate Court Marina Kratanchuk
, October 72008 between «VMSU Pacific Fleet» (the general contractor) and «Forest block» (sub-contractor) signed a subcontract to perform: «Building 219-apartment 10-storey apartment building in a residential area,» Snow Pad «in the . Vladivostok. time of work and completion — September 302009. However, breach of contract, LLC «Forest block» of surrendered and gave them only the general contractor December 252010 permission to enter the facility received December 282010.
Violation of obligations under the contract of «VMSU PF» accrued penalty subcontractor using a minimum interest rate of bank refinancing for the period 1 November 2009 to 25 December 2010 in the amount of 3693 rubles 29337. Unpaid LLC «Forest block» in voluntarily forfeit served as the basis for the treatment of «VMSU PF» with a claim for the recovery of her in that size.
Arbitration Court of Primorye 4 February 2013 stated requirements have been met in full, because the defendant was not presented as evidence of work within the time specified in the contract and evidence of circulation to the customer with a request to suspend the work. Fifth Appellate Court, having considered the May 222013 an appeal LLC «Forest block» found no reason to cancel the decision and upheld it.
.