Management of Federal Antimonopoly service of Primorye

Management of Federal Antimonopoly service for the Primorsky Krai conducted an unscheduled exit check against RUSHYDRO VPO far Eastern Federal University. As the press-service of the Primorsky management Department, the subject of the audit was the control of compliance with the FEFU provisions of Art. 11 of the FZ «On protection of competition» in 2012 at an open auction in the electronic form on the right to conclude a contract on delivery of a complex distributed computing system for the needs of the University, with the condition of installation and commissioning, including training of the auction documentation, conclusion and execution of the contract. Based on audit results Seaside UFAS Russia initiated a case against LLC «Art-Line technology», LLC «STD-Art», LLC «Маррис» and LLC «МП24» p. 2 hours 1 item 11 of the FZ «On protection of competition» in part of the agreement that led to the increase of the initial (maximum) contract price and the maintenance of prices on the open auction in the electronic form on the right to conclude a contract on delivery of a complex distributed computing system for the needs of the far Eastern state University, with the condition of installation and commissioning. The second case was filed on the grounds of violation of LLC «Маррис», LLC «Art-Line technology» and Federal state Autonomous educational institution of higher professional education of the far Eastern Federal University'clock 2 item 11 of the FZ «On protection of competition» in terms of «vertical» agreements, which led to the establishment inflated prices resale of the goods by the delivery of a complex distributed computing system for the needs of the far Eastern state University with a condition of mounting and commissioning. Consideration of cases scheduled for the end of June. «The test was conducted on the basis of the application of FSB of Russia for the Primorsky Krai and together with the staff of the Department. From the scanned documents and explanation follows that if the auction are signs of overestimate of the contract price in half to two times. Is it so or not will be seen in the consideration of such cases», - commented Deputy head of the seaside UFAS Russia Dmitry Abrosimov.

Egor Ivanov